Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 – United Kingdom

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 is an Act of the United Kingdom Parliament that was introduced by the Home Office and the Ministry of Justice, and enacted on 28 April 2022. This Act implements significant change across the criminal justice system, including how children and young people are sentenced and how they are managed in the community. It received Royal Assent on 28 April 2022. The Government have published a number of ‘factsheets’ which contain a useful summary of each key change. The Act has affected various aspects of criminal law including legislation on:  

  • • knife crime
  • • public protests  
  • • crimes against children
  • • sentencing limits

The key amendments are:

  • • The creation of a statutory duty which would require the court to consider the welfare of the child when deciding whether to remand a child into custody;
  • • Strengthening the ‘necessity’ condition so that remand to youth detention can only be imposed when the child’s risk cannot be safely managed in the community and in the absence of a viable alternative;
  • • Strengthening the ‘real prospect of custody’ test when considering a remand to custody so that the court must be of the opinion that the prospect of a custodial sentence is ‘very likely’;
  • • Amending the history condition so that previous instances of breach or offending while on bail must be significant, relevant, and recent, to avoid instances of an isolated breach resulting in custodial remand;
  • • Significant changes to Detention and Training Orders (DTOs). This includes the removal of the current system of specified lengths in favour of giving sentencing courts more discretion as to the length of DTOs, providing that the period is between 4 and 24 months. In order to justify this change, there is a complementary proposal that time spent on remand or bail subject to a qualifying curfew condition and an electronic monitoring condition is counted as time served and credited against the custodial section of the Detention Training Order;
  • • Some frameworks are set out for the oversight of  ‘secure schools’ which are a planned new form of youth custody which the Government claims will be more successful in rehabilitating offenders and reducing reoffending.  These  The first secure school is due to open on the site of the former Medway Secure Training Centre in 2023.  According to recent Justice Committee evidence it is hoped that children will begin being placed here in 2024.  So these plans remain some way off fruition;
  • • Changes to Youth Rehabilitation Orders (YROs). Notably, these include increasing the maximum daily curfew from 16 to 20 hours (although the maximum number of weekly curfew hours will be unchanged), extending activity requirements under Intensive Supervision and Surveillance from 6 to 12 months, adding electronic monitoring of children’s whereabouts and making Youth Offending Teams the Responsible Officer for YROs with an electronic monitoring requirement;
  • • Introducing a statutory obligation for the courts to record their reasons in writing for imposing custodial remand on a child and for this written record to be provided to the child, their legal representative, and the YOT. This provision requires the courts to indicate that they have considered the welfare of the child in their decision and the best interests principle and whether it would have been possible to remand the child into the care of the local authority as an alternative. This obligation will also reinforce the existing presumption of non-custodial remand by ensuring the courts consider remand to local authority accommodation as a first step;
  • • Increasing the time spent in custody for children convicted of certain offences from the current halfway point to two-thirds of their custodial sentence length. This would apply to children sentenced to terms of imprisonment of more than seven years for serious violent or sexual offences including includes manslaughter, section 18 GBH and sexual offences for which a life imprisonment may be imposed.
  • • Changes to mandatory minimum sentences and terms for particular offences have been made which will increase the length of time children spend in custody and also the number or children in custody and the number of adults in custody for offences committed in childhood. These include amendments to the offence of threatening with a weapon or bladed article, and for repeat weapon offences, for those aged 16 and over.  Additionally, the starting points for minimum custodial terms for murder committed as a child have been amended so that in a number of catagories children will face higher sentences.
  • • A number of the broader proposals set out in the Act will also have particularly significant consequences for children and their rights.

The main areas of concern are:

The introduction of new duties for local authorities to collaborate and plan to  prevent and reduce serious violence. This involves plans for the sharing of information by institutions such as schools and youth custody authorities with the police. The Act also proposes the introduction of “Serious Violence Reduction Orders” (“SVROs”) which would allow the police to search without grounds any person subject to such an order. At this stage SVROs are not proposed to apply to children, however there are concerns about whether this may change and, in any event how the orders will affect children;

Plans to expand the use of live links in courts which have raised concerns as to how effectively children are able to participate in remote court proceedings;

Rehabilitation periods will be reduced meaning that criminal records will become ‘spent’ faster;

Changes to protest law and the introduction of new offences and harsher sentences in this area risk criminalising more children, for example increasing the maximum penalty for criminal damage of less that £5,000 to a memorial from 3 months to 10 years imprisonment.

Snapshots !

No items found.
Subscribe to our Newsletter